Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

If the Mets trade R.A. Dickey, what do you think the return will be?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

markakis8

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
12,081
Reaction score
2
Honestly, I think they are better off keeping him in case they pull of a miraculous run a la the Orioles last year. I don't think the return is going to be what the Mets are even thinking of.
 

WaxPax

Active member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
2,845
Reaction score
12
Location
The Land Of Always Baseball....Sunny Florida
Reports are he's looking for 4-5 year deal, and the Mets are think 2+ option. I can see a scenario where if the Angels don't resign Greinke, the Mets could try a Trumbo for Dickey deal...Just a thought
 

HPC

New member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
6,709
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I cant see a team giving more than a 2 year deal with a club option for year 3 if they were to trade him and a team tries to work out an extension.

Even with how good he was last year, he is still 37 years old and a primary knuckleballer.

...so to answer the OP's question, I dont see them acquiring top prospects but probably a veteran and 2 mid-level prospects
 
Last edited:

elmalo

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,216
Reaction score
0
Isnt he like 38 years old? Gonna be tough to get much for that.
 

braves3331

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Location
Las Vegas, NV
I wonder if Boston would take a stab at him? I know there's rumors they may try to move Ellsbury, but not sure Dickey for Ellsbury would make sense. Maybe a package deal with Dickey and a couple of prospects?
 

markakis8

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
12,081
Reaction score
2
I wonder if Boston would take a stab at him? I know there's rumors they may try to move Ellsbury, but not sure Dickey for Ellsbury would make sense. Maybe a package deal with Dickey and a couple of prospects?

If the Mets got offered Ellsbury, they should take it and run. Don't look back.
 

HPC

New member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
6,709
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
If the Mets got offered Ellsbury, they should take it and run. Don't look back.

Mets dont have the prospects to give back that would make trading Ellsbury available in a package for Dickey

(unless NY changes its stance on keeping Wheeler)
 

19braves77

Active member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
3,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Pensacola, FL
He would be a freakin beast on Astroturf. Twins or Astros give up Aaron Hicks or a small group of bullpen arms for him.
 

markakis8

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
12,081
Reaction score
2
Mets dont have the prospects to give back that would make trading Ellsbury available in a package for Dickey

(unless NY changes its stance on keeping Wheeler)

I was just referring to a Dickey/Ellsbury straight up which would never happen in a million years.
 

19braves77

Active member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
3,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Pensacola, FL
I was just referring to a Dickey/Ellsbury straight up which would never happen in a million years.

what about 8 years from now when Dickey is in his Phil Hiekro years and Ellsbury is in his Johnny Damon years ? Doesnt seem so absurd in that context.
 

markakis8

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
12,081
Reaction score
2
what about 8 years from now when Dickey is in his Phil Hiekro years and Ellsbury is in his Johnny Damon years ? Doesnt seem so absurd in that context.

Ellsbury at his best and healthy is a perennial MVP candidate - Damon was never an MVP candidate. And it's absurd to assume that Dickey will be playing in 8 years. So to make that trade on those assumptions would quickly lose your job as a GM.
 

elmalo

New member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
5,216
Reaction score
0
Ellsbury at his best and healthy is a perennial MVP candidate - Damon was never an MVP candidate. And it's absurd to assume that Dickey will be playing in 8 years. So to make that trade on those assumptions would quickly lose your job as a GM.

Perenial MVP candidate? He had 1 year that was close to MVP calliber. Hes a good player, I wouldnt go that far though. And him staying healthy seems to big s big problem.
 

yclipper21

New member
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
Ellsbury at his best and healthy is a perennial MVP candidate - Damon was never an MVP candidate. And it's absurd to assume that Dickey will be playing in 8 years. So to make that trade on those assumptions would quickly lose your job as a GM.

Perennial MVP candidate??? I don't agree with that. Very Good player, but had one great year, and seems to be a major health risk. Damon being shrugged off as not an MVP candidate is laughable because I would take Damon over Ellsbury in their prime anyday. Damon is arguably a fringe Hall of Famer. Ellsbury at this point in time might not be an all-time player for the Red Sox. I would think the dodgers make a major play for dickey.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

AmishDave

Featured Contributor, Collector Showcase, Senior M
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
12,384
Reaction score
40
Location
Ely, MN
Trade him to the Marlins for Reyes.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top