Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Nick1190 said:is this thread a joke? Kind of sad that a mod created this thread.
Just shows that anyone could be a mod on this site.
bradical said:Nick1190 said:is this thread a joke? Kind of sad that a mod created this thread.
Just shows that anyone could be a mod on this site.
I am not sure what being a moderator has to do with anything... but thanks for your helpful and well thought out response and evidence behind your opinion.
Nick1190 said:You're a moron.
Nick1190 said:bradical said:Nick1190 said:is this thread a joke? Kind of sad that a mod created this thread.
Just shows that anyone could be a mod on this site.
I am not sure what being a moderator has to do with anything... but thanks for your helpful and well thought out response and evidence behind your opinion.
You're a moron.
Thanked.sportscardtheory said:Nick1190 said:bradical said:Nick1190 said:is this thread a joke? Kind of sad that a mod created this thread.
Just shows that anyone could be a mod on this site.
I am not sure what being a moderator has to do with anything... but thanks for your helpful and well thought out response and evidence behind your opinion.
You're a moron.
Relax. Clearly you aren't understanding what he was even getting at. He is talking about the time between being drafted and making an impact in the Majors. Leake may not be the "best draft pick in 10 years", but there's no need to attack the OP like you are.
Lars said:Leake maybe the next Joel Pineiro...
Edit: He doesn't belong in any discussions as the best of anything in the draft during the past 10 years unless you are making up your own selective criteria.
Topnotchsy said:Thanked.
While the OP was not completely clear in his initial post, I really don't get why people are so quick to jump on anyone's back, especially after he explained his position. It is interesting that what is a standard draft consideration in other leagues (immediate impact) is not in baseball, but hypothetically, it could become a consideration.
Did anyone read this? Haha calm down there buddy, and use a little grammartowsontiger1121 said:no way is this thread serious. the only reason leake made majors so quick is he had 4 years of college he is a avg pitcher at best and a era of 4 is nothing special any pitcher in the league that gets leakes run support would have as many wins or more i dont understand this love for leake. i mean can we mention younger players that by the time there 23 will have big impacts such as mike stanton freddie freeman and jason heyward . lets not forget kershaw is the same age and were not even mentioning stars like lincecom and price this is a joke leake is a joke and his off field issues only add to it. this guy will be a 3rd of the rotattion starter at best . i cant believe that you can even consider him a top 100 pick in the last ten years thats crazy absured your talking since 2001 wow im sure you can list many many players i means hes already 23 and has 17 wins ( who cares) thats not special . 23 isnt young either when you have 21 yr old i mentioned above performing at high levels and future guys such as trout and harper only gonna be 19 when they are both in majors performing at 23 is expected not great . be for real man mike leake wow why did you even say that? have you been drinking?
gilbert said:I am just wondering how long it will be before there is a stat created for "immediate impact."
fkw said:4.08 ERA lol, the Phillies and Giants have TEAM ERA'sof 3.13 and 3.14. And 22 of the 30 teams in baseball have TEAM ERAs under 4.08.... 22 Teams!!! Even the Reds have a team ERA under 4.08, so in reality his ERA is well below Average!!!
and a journeyman who has bounced around has an ERA nearly 1/2 of that (Vogelsong)
Wake Up Call!!... 4.08 in any league is nothing to get jacked about.
The 17 wins at 23 years old is nothing special too... just saying