Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Is the 2010 Giants staff comparible to the 90's Braves Staff

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
Lincecum
Cain
Sanchez
Bumgarner

Maddux
Glavine
Smoltz
Avery

Granted that there are 3 HOFers in the Braves staff but the Giants have some great arms that could potentially be great as Lincecum is on his way to Cooperstown IMO.
 

braden

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
0
Not yet and not even close. And that's not taking anything away from the Giants staff (though I don't think Sanchez belongs in the same breath as Lincecum and Cain). It's just that Braves staff was exceptionally rare. Once in a lifetime rare.
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
I think Bumgarner will be the third ace in that rotation. Lincecum reminds me a ton of Maddux now with that changeup. Cain is a lot like Smoltz and Bumgarner is a like Avery preinjuries.
 

dutchj16

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
574
Reaction score
0
braden said:
Not yet and not even close. And that's not taking anything away from the Giants staff (though I don't think Sanchez belongs in the same breath as Lincecum and Cain). It's just that Braves staff was exceptionally rare. Once in a lifetime rare.

Agreed they are not even on the same level, in regards to Bumgarner, just not sure that his lack of strikeouts and really good secondary pitches will vault him into being considered an ace.
 

SamHell

New member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
1,612
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Not even close for Sanchez. Let's talk about the others in 7-10 years.
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
dutchj16 said:
braden said:
Not yet and not even close. And that's not taking anything away from the Giants staff (though I don't think Sanchez belongs in the same breath as Lincecum and Cain). It's just that Braves staff was exceptionally rare. Once in a lifetime rare.

Agreed they are not even on the same level, in regards to Bumgarner, just not sure that his lack of strikeouts and really good secondary pitches will vault him into being considered an ace.

You didn't see Bumgarner's secondary pitches last night, they were dazzling.
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
SamHell said:
Not even close for Sanchez. Let's talk about the others in 7-10 years.

Well Zack Wheeler will be taking his place down the line.
 

abravesfan

New member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
1,432
Reaction score
0
mwashuc06 said:
I think Bumgarner will be the third ace in that rotation. Lincecum reminds me a ton of Maddux now with that changeup. Cain is a lot like Smoltz and Bumgarner is a like Avery preinjuries.

don't see it all. Lincecum dominates through his stuff, k's 2-4 more guys per 9, walks 2-3 more per nine... maddux was all control and gameplan, lincecum is also nowhere near as efficient

lincecum's changeup is also a different sort of pitch than maddux's, who if i recall correctly threw a circle change whereas lincecum's changeup is actually more like a splitter, just with a siginificant velocity difference from his fastball... both dominant pitches to be sure, but not all that comparable

and come back in 6-8 years before making comparisons to the braves rotation, 3 hall of famers, 2 300 game winners, 7 cy youngs in 8 years (of course maddux's first was with the cubs)... lincecum is certainly a star pitcher, and cain very good, but simply no way that rotation is in the same discussion right now
 

dutchj16

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
574
Reaction score
0
mwashuc06 said:
dutchj16 said:
braden said:
Not yet and not even close. And that's not taking anything away from the Giants staff (though I don't think Sanchez belongs in the same breath as Lincecum and Cain). It's just that Braves staff was exceptionally rare. Once in a lifetime rare.

Agreed they are not even on the same level, in regards to Bumgarner, just not sure that his lack of strikeouts and really good secondary pitches will vault him into being considered an ace.

You didn't see Bumgarner's secondary pitches last night, they were dazzling.

True I didn't but I'm not sure how much I trust your scouting opinion, no offense.
 

mwashuc06

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,453
Reaction score
1
Bornagaincollector said:
The Braves fab four were not that great in the postseason.1 championship with that rotation is not great.


Smoltz was the best postseason pitcher of all time.
 

Bornagaincollector

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,708
Reaction score
0
Location
Cleveland,Ohio
mwashuc06 said:
Bornagaincollector said:
The Braves fab four were not that great in the postseason.1 championship with that rotation is not great.


Smoltz was the best postseason pitcher of all time.

Yeah 15-4 2.67 is great,But i'm looking at them as a team.And that team with that kind of pitching and only winning 1 title is underachieving!
 

All The Hype

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,250
Reaction score
0
Location
Indianapolis
Meh. The Braves won their Division 11 times in a row because of their dominant pitching.


The Giants have won their Division 1 time in a row because of their pitching.


They have a tough staff, but it's way, way too early to even try to make this comparison right now.
 

ronfromfresno

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,037
Reaction score
22
Location
Fresno, CA
I think the comparison is pretty close, remember the Braves rotation was young once too and Maddux had a Cy Young early in his career, but Timmy has two.
 

darocker80

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
15,534
Reaction score
0
Location
Lincecum Land
Maybe/hopefully a start to a great staff. The potential is obviously there, and bumgarner performing the way he is in his rookie year... :o
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top