Poll: Better Prospect Product (2008 Edition)

[soccerman034]

Thought this would be interesting.

Both have terrible break value.

Both have considerable potential in the future (depending on your outlook)....

Which one do you choose?

I would also like to point out that many, including Razor executives, called Bowman Chrome a terrible product. This is not a shot at Razor, but merely a fact.

 

[PaulKonerkbro]

chrome is always better

 

[aw00d05]

Chrome just because of the few names that top the list.

 

[Johan Santana 57]

chrome was bad because of the huge checklist

yet you can stll pull Heyward, Laporta, Price, Moose Blue and Gold AU that sell higher than anything Letterman will give you except for the USA jerseys

 

[sportscardtheory]

I don't mind Razor's prospect products, but I will take ML licensed cards any day of the week.

 

[ryanhoward06]

chrome was bad because of the huge checklist

yet you can stll pull Heyward, Laporta, Price, Moose Blue and Gold AU that sell higher than anything Letterman will give you except for the USA jerseys

Wrong one. He's talking about the one released in August with Lars, Angel, etc.

 

[cgilmo]

chrome was bad because of the huge checklist

yet you can stll pull Heyward, Laporta, Price, Moose Blue and Gold AU that sell higher than anything Letterman will give you except for the USA jerseys

all of those names were in the base bowman release, not bowman chrome

 

[Johan Santana 57]

Im an idiot. Thanks haha, whoops

 

[sheetskout]

I don't think you can compare the two. One is a product aimed at first issue cards, the second is not.(Letterman).

 

[HoustonTeams4Me]

chrome was bad because of the huge checklist

yet you can stll pull Heyward, Laporta, Price, Moose Blue and Gold AU that sell higher than anything Letterman will give you except for the USA jerseys

Wrong one. He's talking about the one released in August with Lars, Angel, etc.

Lars & Angel are good enough for me! Now if the Razor option was Sig series (or Metal) then I'd choose Razor, but I don't think manufactured letter's in any product (especially prospect's) is a good investment!

 

[HoustonTeams4Me]

I don't think you can compare the two. One is a product aimed at first issue cards, the second is not.(Letterman).

:lol: That's funny, as the OP just did!

 

[soccerman034]

I don't think you can compare the two. One is a product aimed at first issue cards, the second is not.(Letterman).

:lol: That's funny, as the OP just did!

My point: Many complained about how terrible a product BC was, including BG. Now lettermen comes out and is just as bad if not worse a product, and the product isn't considered a "failure."

Now, I happen to like letterman from a fan perspective; I am a Rashun Dixon fan and am thus trying to complete his name plate. From a break to resale perspective or even from a holding for future resale perspective, I am talking BC everytime.

 

[MacK]

Chrome.

 

[cgilmo]

ok


I will give you a box of letterman, or a box of 08 bowman chrome

choose one.

 

[soccerman034]

ok


I will give you a box of letterman, or a box of 08 bowman chrome

choose one.

I beleive Letterman's SRP was $40-50 higher than BC.

 

[bballcardkid]

Give me the Lettermen. What do you take:

1 Chaz Roe

vs.

5 Edgar Olmos

I'll take 5 scrub autos compared to 1 scrub auto any day.

 

[soccerman034]

How about Chaz Roe and $45 or 5 Olmos?

You can't compare a box by box breakdown of the products due to different setups (5 packs vs. 20) and different SRP's.

 

[PaulKonerkbro]

dont forget that base chromes can sell well....

 

[arod305]

Letterman maybe one of the worst products of the year...

 

[bballcardkid]

How about Chaz Roe and $45 or 5 Olmos?

You can't compare a box by box breakdown of the products due to different setups (5 packs vs. 20) and different SRP's.

He just asked a question. He will give me a box, I'm not paying for it, right? I don't care what it costs if I'm getting it free. Give me 5 Olmos over 1 Roe please.