- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Messier2 said:Well, for the record, I'm a Ebay Value person. i just can't imagine trading for a card that "books" for $30 but sells for $2 for a card that books for for $30 and sells for $15.
But, I don't trade much so I don't really have to worry about that as much as others.
coltsfan23 said:I'm glad SV is winning by such a huge margin.
I posted this poll on another semi-large forum and I doubt I get nearly the same result.
ffgameman said:For one I feel because TCC has a lot less collectors involved in prospecting than FCB.
If you are trading plain, low-to-medium end GU cards isn't it much easier to use book value?
coltsfan23 said:I'm glad SV is winning by such a huge margin.
I posted this poll on another semi-large forum and I doubt I get nearly the same result.
coltsfan23 said:ffgameman said:For one I feel because TCC has a lot less collectors involved in prospecting than FCB.
If you are trading plain, low-to-medium end GU cards isn't it much easier to use book value?
coltsfan23 said:I'm glad SV is winning by such a huge margin.
I posted this poll on another semi-large forum and I doubt I get nearly the same result.
Are there actual prospectors on TCC? I've always wondered that. Besides the few that are both on there and here, I don't think I know of any true ones.
Anyways, I don't think it's necessarily prospecting but more highend cards in general. I think that was your point and, if so, I concur. TCC is geared towards the lowend collector in gu/midend autos at best, so they don't really care. I'm just curious to see the margin there and compare it to FCB's margin.