Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

PSA Sub - does PSA stand for Pretty Sucky Assistance?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Fandruw25

Active member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
3,238
Reaction score
0
cgilmo said:
RandomH said:
Kinda shatty for PSA not to honor an agreement.


it isn't that simple


You know more than anyone else in this thread. Why not fully explain the situation and let the truth formulate the decisions of FCB members? Dropping 1-2 sentences helps shapes opinions, good or bad.
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
37,212
Reaction score
35
Location
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
Fandruw25 said:
cgilmo said:
RandomH said:
Kinda shatty for PSA not to honor an agreement.


it isn't that simple


You know more than anyone else in this thread. Why not fully explain the situation and let the truth formulate the decisions of FCB members? Dropping 1-2 sentences helps shapes opinions, good or bad.


I did explain it in full. Even by my explanation it isn't as simple as them just all the sudden not wanting the deal. There is a long time gap between the deal being negotiated and our first sub attempt.
 

Fandruw25

Active member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
3,238
Reaction score
0
cgilmo said:
Fandruw25 said:
cgilmo said:
RandomH said:
Kinda shatty for PSA not to honor an agreement.


it isn't that simple


You know more than anyone else in this thread. Why not fully explain the situation and let the truth formulate the decisions of FCB members? Dropping 1-2 sentences helps shapes opinions, good or bad.


I did explain it in full. Even by my explanation it isn't as simple as them just all the sudden not wanting the deal. There is a long time gap between the deal being negotiated and our first sub attempt.

I saw your explanation, I read it as them wanting all or nothing...if they got all, then all was good...if not well, FCB can pound sand. Maybe I'm missing the critical info, if that's the case, I'm sorry. My fault. I just think that if you were to throw these type comments into a Leaf/topps/UD thread then you could have some sway with the masses...good/bad/indifferent.
 

George_Calfas

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
36,264
Reaction score
31
Location
Urbana
Fandruw25 said:
cgilmo said:
Fandruw25 said:
cgilmo said:
RandomH said:
Kinda shatty for PSA not to honor an agreement.

it isn't that simple

You know more than anyone else in this thread. Why not fully explain the situation and let the truth formulate the decisions of FCB members? Dropping 1-2 sentences helps shapes opinions, good or bad.

I did explain it in full. Even by my explanation it isn't as simple as them just all the sudden not wanting the deal. There is a long time gap between the deal being negotiated and our first sub attempt.

I saw your explanation, I read it as them wanting all or nothing...if they got all, then all was good...if not well, FCB can pound sand. Maybe I'm missing the critical info, if that's the case, I'm sorry. My fault. I just think that if you were to throw these type comments into a Leaf/topps/UD thread then you could have some sway with the masses...good/bad/indifferent.

Sounds as if FCB would have sent a sub shortly after the deal being made things could have been good. However; this sub was many months after the Natty and might have appeared that FCB is not serious about sending large lots to PSA monthly.
 

cgilmo

Well-known member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
37,212
Reaction score
35
Location
Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
George_Calfas said:
Fandruw25 said:
cgilmo said:
Fandruw25 said:
cgilmo said:
[quote="RandomH":zdaxg2to]Kinda shatty for PSA not to honor an agreement.

it isn't that simple

You know more than anyone else in this thread. Why not fully explain the situation and let the truth formulate the decisions of FCB members? Dropping 1-2 sentences helps shapes opinions, good or bad.

I did explain it in full. Even by my explanation it isn't as simple as them just all the sudden not wanting the deal. There is a long time gap between the deal being negotiated and our first sub attempt.

I saw your explanation, I read it as them wanting all or nothing...if they got all, then all was good...if not well, FCB can pound sand. Maybe I'm missing the critical info, if that's the case, I'm sorry. My fault. I just think that if you were to throw these type comments into a Leaf/topps/UD thread then you could have some sway with the masses...good/bad/indifferent.

Sounds as if FCB would have sent a sub shortly after the deal being made things could have been good. However; this sub was many months after the Natty and might have appeared that FCB is not serious about sending large lots to PSA monthly.[/quote:zdaxg2to]

Well it isn't that simple either. When the deal was struck it was noted that it would take some time to get a process down and to get it promoted on the site. They weren't exactly expecting cards the next week.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top