All The Hype
Active member
“Our motion essentially argued that because he had a designated driver who got drunk that night, it amounts to manslaughter,” Goodman said. “He’s not a murderer.”
Goodman added that Gallo “didn’t want to keep drinking, but other people kept buying him drinks.”
Read more: http://www.swrnn.com/southwest-riversid ... z0wW8XMIK3
So basically their argument is that it's everyone else's fault that the idiot got drunk. If they hadn't kept buying him drinks, he wouldn't have got drunk. And it's his DD's fault for getting drunk so he HAD to drive.
Sorry, not the way it works. How about taking a little bit of accountability when it's obvious that you ****** up badly?