- Thread starter
- #61
MansGame
Well-known member
^^ I need to find out what the colums are for these numbers... where did you pull this from?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Albert Belle is not HOF worthy.
While yes, he dominated pitching in the 90's with his incredible season averages, his overall career numbers are not reflective of a HOF caliber player.
If Belle does by some chance get in but guys like Mark Grace, Nomar, and Mattingly don't, there is something wrong with the Hall of Fame and it's voters.
Are you saying Mark Grace, Nomar, and Mattingly put up the numbers Albert Belle did?
Nomar put together 6 HOF seasons, that's it.
Mark Grace was consistent in hits and average and nothing else.
Don Mattingly had 4 HOF season, 5 at MOST. And he declined in power steadily in what should've been his prime years, regardless of the reason.
Albert Belle put up a legit 10 HOF seasons. The other 3 players you listed aren't even close to the same caliber hitter Belle was.
Where did I say at all that they put up the same numbers he did???
The point Im making is that there are guys, like Belle, who put up consistent numbers throughout their careers which can now be considered HOF worthy, but are not in the HOF.
If Belle gets in, but guys like I mentioned don't, then there is something wrong with the HOF.
It's clear you don't see how far ahead of a hitter Belle was from Grace, Mattingly, and Nomar. When you say "if Belle gets in and guys like Grace, Mattingly, and Nomar don't, there is something wrong with the HOF", it makes you appear as if you are saying they were just as good of a hitter as Belle.
It's clear you don't see how far ahead of a hitter Belle was from Grace, Mattingly, and Nomar. When you say "if Belle gets in and guys like Grace, Mattingly, and Nomar don't, there is something wrong with the HOF", it makes you appear as if you are saying they were just as good of a hitter as Belle.
You are completely missing my point and keep trying to justify Belle getting in by saying how dominant he was and that alone is the basis for his acceptance. No one is debating he wasnt a dominant hitter.
So you also must believe Mo Vaughn is a HOF'er too, right?
Your point is either unclear or, as in my view, completely wrong.
No, like Mattingly, Mo Vaughn was an elite hitter for a shorter period of time as well and was steadily declining after a 4 or 5 year peak.
Uh, Vaughn and Belle's season averages are almost identical bro
Vaughn (12yrs) - 162games, 174hits, .293ba, 35hr, 114rbi, .906ops
Belle (10yrs) - 162games, 182hits, .295ba, 40hr, 130rbi, .933ops
Based on your argument that Belle should be allowed in because he was a dominant hitter during the 90's, Vaughn should no doubt be in the HOF right next to him.
Plus, you say my pov is wrong? Apparently not, since 53 other people polled agree with me compared to the 13 others who agree with you.
Black Ink | Batting - 4 (423), Average HOFer ≈ 27 |
Gray Ink | Batting - 78 (312), Average HOFer ≈ 144 |
Hall of Fame Monitor | Batting - 86 (204), Likely HOFer ≈ 100 |
Hall of Fame Standards | Batting - 30 (315), Average HOFer ≈ 50 |
Black Ink | Batting - 28 (64), Average HOFer ≈ 27 |
Gray Ink | Batting - 137 (122), Average HOFer ≈ 144 |
Hall of Fame Monitor | Batting - 135 (98), Likely HOFer ≈ 100 |
Hall of Fame Standards | Batting - 36 (200), Average HOFer ≈ 50 |
Not sure where you got Mo from, he wasn't nearly as dominant.
Mo:
Belle:
Black Ink
Batting - 4 (423), Average HOFer ≈ 27
Gray Ink
Batting - 78 (312), Average HOFer ≈ 144
Hall of Fame Monitor
Batting - 86 (204), Likely HOFer ≈ 100
Hall of Fame Standards
Batting - 30 (315), Average HOFer ≈ 50
Black Ink
Batting - 28 (64), Average HOFer ≈ 27
Gray Ink
Batting - 137 (122), Average HOFer ≈ 144
Hall of Fame Monitor
Batting - 135 (98), Likely HOFer ≈ 100
Hall of Fame Standards
Batting - 36 (200), Average HOFer ≈ 50
This is the best site for baseball hands down. enjoy.^^ I need to find out what the colums are for these numbers... where did you pull this from?
This is the best site for baseball hands down. enjoy.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/belleal01.shtml
at the top right just put in any players name.
Uh, Vaughn and Belle's season averages are almost identical bro
Vaughn (12yrs) - 162games, 174hits, .293ba, 35hr, 114rbi, .906ops
Belle (10yrs) - 162games, 182hits, .295ba, 40hr, 130rbi, .933ops
Based on your argument that Belle should be allowed in because he was a dominant hitter during the 90's, Vaughn should no doubt be in the HOF right next to him.
Plus, you say my pov is wrong? Apparently not, since 53 other people polled agree with me compared to the 13 others who agree with you.