- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Austin said:Wow, Eric Hurley's already down to #20.
Each year's new prospect crop always pushes down the previous years' studs.
Remember when Thomas Diamond was among the Rangers' top prospects? Now he's battling back from Tommy John surgery.
I'm glad the Rangers' system is so stacked, but I'd rather have Michael Young than Evis Andrus, and I'm happy with Kinsler at 2nd and Chris Davis at 1st.
And 17 of the top 24 prospects are pitchers! Finally some hope for Texas.
2) Justin Smoak, 1B, Grade A-: I like him better than Alonso and Hosmer, and frankly I can’t believe the Rangers got him.5) Taylor Teagarden, C, Grade B: Excellent glove with power, could hit anywhere from .230 to .280 though.
8) Michael Main, RHP, Grade B: Impressive Midwest League performance, and if instructional league reports are accurate he is primed for a huge breakout
rookierolodex said:A few comments I like alot:
2) Justin Smoak, 1B, Grade A-: I like him better than Alonso and Hosmer, and frankly I can’t believe the Rangers got him.5) Taylor Teagarden, C, Grade B: Excellent glove with power, could hit anywhere from .230 to .280 though.
8) Michael Main, RHP, Grade B: Impressive Midwest League performance, and if instructional league reports are accurate he is primed for a huge breakout
I agree have no idea how Smoak slide other than fear of signing, but comman to much talent. Teagarden, well Iam a big fan, and 3rd Main, I have a TON invested!!![]()