- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
cgilmo said:At least initially you are going to have to fight against the stigma that your base cards aren't worth squat. Because of this, I think it would be a mistake to release anything that centers around base cards.
cgilmo said:At least initially you are going to have to fight against the stigma that your base cards aren't worth squat. Because of this, I think it would be a mistake to release anything that centers around base cards.
razorent said:cgilmo said:At least initially you are going to have to fight against the stigma that your base cards aren't worth squat. Because of this, I think it would be a mistake to release anything that centers around base cards.
what if products 2 and 3 had NO base cards????
HPC said:I personally Like the last option better. It gives it an EEE numbering system that will make the cards more desireable, since the sleeper might have only 149 of his auto produced, where as a bigger name might have 399.
Id buy more of it if they are numbered this way rather than the same amount for everybody
ryanhoward06 said:HPC said:I personally Like the last option better. It gives it an EEE numbering system that will make the cards more desireable, since the sleeper might have only 149 of his auto produced, where as a bigger name might have 399.
Id buy more of it if they are numbered this way rather than the same amount for everybody
I forgot about that. I voted for all 399 but I like that better.
Also, how will you guys be making the cards Chrome?
ryanhoward06 said:HPC said:I personally Like the last option better. It gives it an EEE numbering system that will make the cards more desireable, since the sleeper might have only 149 of his auto produced, where as a bigger name might have 399.
Id buy more of it if they are numbered this way rather than the same amount for everybody
I forgot about that. I voted for all 399 but I like that better.
Also, how will you guys be making the cards Chrome?
cgilmo said:im suprised this got to page 2
AKA Coastal said:They all need to be numbered to /399. Numbering to different numbers is not a good idea. People try to corner the market on thepit. If you keep them all numbered at /399 this would be much tougher to do than say a card numbered /149. Don't forget some people will buy the cards and get them shipped to them. This will also take some of the cards out of the market. Keep them all at /399 and the market will be able to stay liquid.
HPC said:AKA Coastal said:They all need to be numbered to /399. Numbering to different numbers is not a good idea. People try to corner the market on thepit. If you keep them all numbered at /399 this would be much tougher to do than say a card numbered /149. Don't forget some people will buy the cards and get them shipped to them. This will also take some of the cards out of the market. Keep them all at /399 and the market will be able to stay liquid.
thepit can do an IPO allowance similar to eTopps