- Thread starter
- #1
Ryan The Orange
Active member
Lackey: 12-12, 6.30 ERA
Burnett: 9-11, 5.27 ERA
Burnett: 9-11, 5.27 ERA
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Can't argue with that.vwnut13 said:The [strike:1fwsawz9]man[/strike:1fwsawz9] child who has the longer contract.
KC37 said:They aren't the same guy? I just assumed it was one guy pitching for both teams.
I didn't even get to see last night's Sox game, as I was at a wedding rehearsal dinner, but got the normal text from my father letting me know that Lackey had given up 5 again. I almost laughed out loud in the middle of the groom's speech.
RL24 said:I voted for A.J. for these reasons...
1. He is terrible this year, and was terrible last year.
2. He makes soooo MUCH MONEY!! last year, the year before, this year, next year, the year after.....
3. He has gotten lucky, because his team is so good. His numbers don't look as bad as they should. You can give up 7 runs and still come away with a W when you play for one of the best teams in the majors. PLUS, he has a cast of all-star defenders behind him helping keep him out of more trouble than he deserves. If he played for Houston, he'd be 0-20 with an ERA of 9.75.
Then I did a little research, and figured something amazing out. ALL of these things apply to Lackey too! :lol: That's amazing! But I had already voted. :lol:
vwnut13 said:RL24 said:I voted for A.J. for these reasons...
1. He is terrible this year, and was terrible last year.
2. He makes soooo MUCH MONEY!! last year, the year before, this year, next year, the year after.....
3. He has gotten lucky, because his team is so good. His numbers don't look as bad as they should. You can give up 7 runs and still come away with a W when you play for one of the best teams in the majors. PLUS, he has a cast of all-star defenders behind him helping keep him out of more trouble than he deserves. If he played for Houston, he'd be 0-20 with an ERA of 9.75.
Then I did a little research, and figured something amazing out. ALL of these things apply to Lackey too! :lol: That's amazing! But I had already voted. :lol:
1. Lackey and Burnett have been equally bad, I'll give you that.
2. Lackey has the exact same contract as Burnett. (8yr/82.5) Burnett's contract expires before Lacky. Burnett is pithcing to a mid-5 era in the third year of his contract. Lackey is pitching to a mid-6 era in the second of his.
3. Lackey's numbers (wins/losses) look better than Burnetts, yet he has much worse numbers (whip/ERA/strikeouts)
Also, Burnett may "have problems", but atleast he doesn't whine when his team doesn't make web gems to get him out of jams. Does Lackey even admit that he is part of the problem, or does he still blame it on his teammates.
And to your other point, I'd rather see Burnett every sixth day then Lackey every fifth.
vwnut13 said:Lackey has the Worst ERA and has allowed the most runs in Baseball. He also owns the second worst WHIP and Batting Average Against. Burnett might not be much better but those stats don't lie.
RiceLynnEvans75 said:vwnut13 said:Lackey has the Worst ERA and has allowed the most runs in Baseball. He also owns the second worst WHIP and Batting Average Against. Burnett might not be much better but those stats don't lie.
Seriously, they both suck. When both suck this much, it really doesn't matter does it?
rebelpawn said:Lackey has gotten so bad that whenever I pull one of his cards I actually throw it out. I don't even want his cards in my collection. And I collect every Red Sox card I can.