- Thread starter
- #1
bballcardkid
New member
Why does Roger Goodell have to go to Washington to defend the NFL's stance on head injuries suffered by players? Don't they have anything better to do right now?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Card Magnet said:He also had to field questions from a few Republicans about the Rush Limbaugh/Rams situation.
This is just as bad as the Congressional hearings on steroids in baseball. I hate the whole idea of steroids in baseball, but I don't want my tax money paying a bunch of guys in the last years of their lives to ramble on about it in a government meeting where they could be doing something more productive to the lives of their constituents.
Maybe to look into cases like Mike Websterbballcardkid said:Why does Roger Goodell have to go to Washington to defend the NFL's stance on head injuries suffered by players? Don't they have anything better to do right now?
madman1978 said:Maybe to look into cases like Mike Websterbballcardkid said:Why does Roger Goodell have to go to Washington to defend the NFL's stance on head injuries suffered by players? Don't they have anything better to do right now?
bballcardkid said:madman1978 said:Maybe to look into cases like Mike Websterbballcardkid said:Why does Roger Goodell have to go to Washington to defend the NFL's stance on head injuries suffered by players? Don't they have anything better to do right now?
What is there to look into?
While I can see the need for investigations, it just seems like it's not something the House should be dealing with.madman1978 said:Maybe to look into cases like Mike Websterbballcardkid said:Why does Roger Goodell have to go to Washington to defend the NFL's stance on head injuries suffered by players? Don't they have anything better to do right now?