- Thread starter
- #21
Jaypers said:Sooooo ugly.....eww.
step up your scanning game on one of those golds
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Jaypers said:Sooooo ugly.....eww.
cgilmo said:Griffin High school in Georgia
Reds in 2009 said:cgilmo said:Griffin High school in Georgia
Gotcha.
Also in your opinion what looks better this card or a blue refractor auto?
pujolsthomefan33 said:I gaurantee that if that card had a bowman chrome logo on it, 98% of the people would love the card and there would be countless posts of look at my metallic blue refractor..........
TK
sethyarkony said:bowman chrome isnt signed on big silver traps that are half empty
sethyarkony said:bowman chrome isnt signed on big silver traps that are half empty
Because they cant.Brad said:I like how RAZOR makes the autograph the focus of the card. It also does not photoshop the cards to change the team on the jersey
pujolsthomefan33 said:I gaurantee that if that card had a bowman chrome logo on it, 98% of the people would love the card and there would be countless posts of look at my metallic blue refractor..........
TK
boxbreaker44 said:Because they cant.Brad said:I like how RAZOR makes the autograph the focus of the card. It also does not photoshop the cards to change the team on the jersey
cgilmo said:pujolsthomefan33 said:I gaurantee that if that card had a bowman chrome logo on it, 98% of the people would love the card and there would be countless posts of look at my metallic blue refractor..........
TK
the head shot argument is quite valid
whatever the big box is called that confines their signature, it still looks stupid.cgilmo said:sethyarkony said:bowman chrome isnt signed on big silver traps that are half empty
it isn't a trap
it is in fact part of the card
flightposite said:pujolsthomefan33 said:I gaurantee that if that card had a bowman chrome logo on it, 98% of the people would love the card and there would be countless posts of look at my metallic blue refractor..........
TK
I disagree. There are quite a few bad design elements in the card. The worst being large auto rectangle with the small portrait circle drives me crazy. Also think they would look better if they had gone with a solid color and dropped the black stripe on them. One thing I do like, is the way their gold and blue coloring looks... minty.
Of course, the people that like it are always going to say, oh it's just that it's Razor that people don't like it, and I tell you, that is so tiring of an argument to hear. I think most people are like me and could give a crap who makes the card, if it looks good, they'll buy it.
Brad said:I just don't like how Bowman does this
![]()
![]()
Also not a fan of using the same photo over and over again