mchenrycards
Featured Contributor, Vintage Corner, Senior Membe
Sorry, Brian, I'll just refer to him as Leaf dude for now on. In reference to gilmo's comment, contracts are broken all the time and there is either a clause in the contract that spells out what happens if it is broken or there is a statutory remedy. Obviously his money needs to be returned but he cannot force them to allow him to participate. That's the sour grapes part.
If a party is harmed by the broken contract and they can prove it, well it is not as simple as returning money and walking away from each other. If it was that easy we wouldnt need the extensive contract law we have on the books today. Go buy a car from a dealer and, after 7 days you decide you dont want it any more....well go ahead and try and return it and tear up your contract. It just isnt going to happen because the dealer has damages he can prove (miles on the car, etc) and will not rip up that contract.
Brian paid his cash to attend and the cash was accepted which means we have a contract. The contract is now broken and now Brian must show damages to prevail which he very well might be able to prove. But I suspect, based on what Brian said earlier that this is not all about not being invited to the summit and losing valuable business contacts. There are other parts of this suit that probably have more implications on the hobby than what meets the eye. I think Brian alluded to this fact previously. I believe there is more than meets the eye here.