- Thread starter
- #1
GameJerseyPR
New member
- Oct 21, 2013
- 508
- 0
My self only look for autographs on cards vs auto on sticker
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I highly doubt there is a single collector out there who prefers stickers to on-card.
I highly doubt there is a single collector out there who prefers stickers to on-card.
T...H...I...SI highly doubt there is a single collector out there who prefers stickers to on-card.
I think I actually prefer stick IF it's in an embedded window on a thick card. Cards like that look like they were designed for an auto in a specific spot, and the card is designed with the window in mind, so the photos and other elements don't get covered up. Too many on-card autos cover up elements of the card or blend into the background. So I guess my order of preference is...
1) Sticker / embedded window
2) On-Card / designated spot to sign
3) On-Card / no designated spot
4) Sticker / no window
P.S. - the grammar in this thread title is so bad I almost refused to post in it.
So you wouldn't prefer an on-card auto in the exact same spot where the embedded sticker is?
I like DLP cards with embedded stickers as well, but soooooo many 2004/2005 sets would look better had they been designed on-card.
I would love this card so much more if the auto were in a faded oval instead of on a trapped sticker...
I don't care too much either way. The way I look at it is, an auto is an auto whether it's on card or on sticker. I guess there is a coolness factor for on card seeing that the player actually touched the same card you're touching, but other than that, I don't see the whole world falling apart theory.