- Thread starter
- #1
tonsofcommons
Active member
Personally, I would like to do a case of 2000 Pacific Invincible. One of my favorites.
What would your favorite be?
What would your favorite be?
Welcome to our community
Be apart of something great, join today!
So you can bust any case of Pacific, what would it be?
- Thread starter tonsofcommons
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
IndyManning18
Active member
2001 Private Stock! Football or Baseball.
- Thread starter
- #3
tonsofcommons
Active member
Good choice!
SeattlefantillIdie
New member
MAN, while I think just about ALL of Pacific is SWEET, I had to go with Crown Royale.... when your BASE card is a die-cut and ALWAYS had a nice look to it, seemed EVERY card was an insert to me! I LOVED how they looked and some of the parallels were VERY nice!
But this has to be one of the toughest polls because Pacific came out with some VERY, VERY nice products during their run.....
But this has to be one of the toughest polls because Pacific came out with some VERY, VERY nice products during their run.....
ThoseBackPages
New member
Tough to say, but it would have to be Hockey
Philip J. Fry
Well-known member
I'm probably the only one but I was never really impressed with Pacific overall. Some inserts were cool (Cramer's Choice, Gold Crown) but that's about it.
ThoseBackPages
New member
Philip J. Fry said:
be grateful, the parallels were KILLERS back when the internet was just a baby!
ThoseBackPages
New member
they dont scan well, but thats six different Sakics
Philip J. Fry
Well-known member
ThoseBackPages said:
I think that's the main reason why I disliked Pacific...so many parallels for certain sets.
cammy collector
New member
Philip J. Fry said:
I think that's the main reason why I disliked Pacific...so many parallels for certain sets.[/quote:v3q6j3da]
that's what makes it so much fun for us player collectors!
PS no '92 Pacific Tom Seaver? :lol:
marterburn
Active member
prism. I am attracted to shiny things.
Philip J. Fry
Well-known member
cammy collector said:[quote="Philip J. Fry"1mupku6]
ThoseBackPages said:[quote="Philip J. Fry"
be grateful, the parallels were KILLERS back when the internet was just a baby!
I think that's the main reason why I disliked Pacific...so many parallels for certain sets.[/quote
1mupku6]that's what makes it so much fun for us player collectors!
PS no '92 Pacific Tom Seaver? :lol:[/quote
1mupku6]Fun my shiny metal ass! How about the Nolan Ryan issue?
MartinFFcollector
New member
Senior. 1990.
I have all the Nettles versions ( error,correct,correct w/o line (print flaw) but I need to upgrade my corrected from 8's and have busted 30 or so sets plus a few wax boxes trying.
I have all the Nettles versions ( error,correct,correct w/o line (print flaw) but I need to upgrade my corrected from 8's and have busted 30 or so sets plus a few wax boxes trying.
I voted for crown royale as that stuff was always too rich for my blood. Only busted one hobby pack of it. I always enjoyed invincible in the kmart buy one get one free blister packs. I remember 00 prism setting a record for most parallels in a set at the time. I just bought a ton of those star parallels cheap from checkoutmycards as each parallel truly is unique in its own way. Man, collecting used to be fun. I fear it will never be the same.
jarcar
New member
ThoseBackPages said:Philip J. Fry said:
be grateful, the parallels were KILLERS back when the internet was just a baby!
Very Cool. Collecting Pacific Hockey cards with my son in 2003 is what brought me back to the hobby, so I will always have a soft spot for Pacific cards.
