Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

IRS wants a cut of your ebay sales

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

justwar

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
1,805
0
They can have it......... IF I can write off my losses on wax and singles.
 

bowmanchromeandorr

New member
May 23, 2010
836
0
Race City USA
"cause i'm the taxman yeah i'm the taxman walk the street and i'll tax your feet, i'm the taxman", this is what happens when certain people are in charge (you know just about all of them), i'm not sayin' i'm just sayin' ...


I'm moving to Del Boca Vista right smack dab between the Costanzas and the Seinfelds
 

A_Pharis

Active member
I think you'd only be able to write off what you lost on items sold. You wouldn't be able to write off a loss on a case if you only attempt to sell 3 cards out of it. You'd have to break it down to each card's worth as a proportion to the case's cost. That'd be like me going and buying 30 shirts and only attempting to sell one and then claiming the cost of all 30 shirts.

If you are going to play the "loss" game, you're going to end up shooting yourself in the foot by having to provide purchase cost and profit of each card.

And they tax eBay on their business. They still have every right to tax you on profits gained. Where have you been?
 

phillyfan0417

Well-known member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
43,551
43
Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
muskiesfan said:
sportscardtheory said:
This is where it becomes unacceptable, THEY ALREADY RECEIVE TAXES FROM EBAY. Now they want to double-dip. This country is going to shat.

Have to pay for Healthcare somehow.



You do realize that if this is indeed true, you will be able to report your losses as well? Any Accountant with a brain will make this work to the advantage of their client...
 

masonphillip

New member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
8,322
0
This is certainly going to be impactful to many here, especially those who do larger amounts of transactions on ebay.

What's really import is keeping track of costs, so if you sell $20K worth of cards online but those cards came from $30K worth of wax cases, then you should not have a tax liability.

You should offset all of your ebay revenue with:

Cost of cards when you originally purchased them
Ebay Fees
Paypal Fees
Shipping Fees
Shipping Supplies - bubble mailers, labels, printer
Milage to and from post office

and so on and so forth.

The people who run businesses likely already report eBay profit, the small sellers who don't won't have to, its the people in the middle this will impact.

To be sure eBay is ticked as well, this isn't going to drive business to their site.
 

muskiesfan

New member
Aug 7, 2008
12,531
0
Murfreesboro, TN
phillyfan0417 said:
muskiesfan said:
sportscardtheory said:
This is where it becomes unacceptable, THEY ALREADY RECEIVE TAXES FROM EBAY. Now they want to double-dip. This country is going to shat.

Have to pay for Healthcare somehow.



You do realize that if this is indeed true, you will be able to report your losses as well? Any Accountant with a brain will make this work to the advantage of their client...

I get it, it was just a poor attempt at humor on my part. :oops:
 

A_Pharis

Active member
masonphillip said:
This is certainly going to be impactful to many here, especially those who do larger amounts of transactions on ebay.

What's really import is keeping track of costs, so if you sell $20K worth of cards online but those cards came from $30K worth of wax cases, then you should not have a tax liability.

You should offset all of your ebay revenue with:

Cost of cards when you originally purchased them
Ebay Fees
Paypal Fees
Shipping Fees
Shipping Supplies - bubble mailers, labels, printer
Milage to and from post office

and so on and so forth.

The people who run businesses likely already report eBay profit, the small sellers who don't won't have to, its the people in the middle this will impact.

To be sure eBay is ticked as well, this isn't going to drive business to their site.

Yeah, but it really doesn't work in a way that you claim the ENTIRE case cost if you did not attempt to sell the entire case. If you could claim a loss on items that you throw into a box in your closet, then I'd never have to pay taxes.
You're going to end up (if you try to play the game with the IRS) having to provide a break down per case of each card's worth.

For instance:

If a case is $700, and there are 7000 card in it, then - as a portion of that case - each card presented $0.10 overhead. So if you only try to sell the 10 major hits from the case, then you would only be able to claim the individual overhead value of those 10 cards.

I can probably speak to my CPA about it.
 

ccouch (Chad)

Member
Aug 8, 2008
444
6
You guys do realize that they've ALWAYS wanted it, right? The laws haven't changed. They've just had a difficult time enforcing the law because they lacked the mechanisms to do so. The new 1099 reporting will change that.

And I'm amused at how many times I see people say that they'll just deduct all of their purchases for the year. If you get audited, even a slightly dumb IRS agent will laugh you out of the room on that one. They'll want to know what your cost basis was in the items that you sold. As an example, the guy who sold the Strasburg Superfractor last week ain't gonna be able to deduct all of his purchases for the year to offset the sale. His cost basis in the card is at a maximum what he paid for the case and would even more likely be determined to be the cost of the case divided by the number of cards in the case.

Commence people telling someone who has a masters degree in taxation that he doesn't know what he's talking about in 3... 2.... 1...
 

Labratt21

New member
Aug 7, 2008
4,812
0
Sacramento, CA
justwar said:
They can have it......... IF I can write off my losses on wax and singles.

HA....that would be interesting if you could refer to it as a gambling loss. Of course if you hit something huge would you report it as a win?
 

Jays_Cards

Active member
Jan 1, 2009
3,845
0
ccouch (Chad) said:
You guys do realize that they've ALWAYS wanted it, right? The laws haven't changed. They've just had a difficult time enforcing the law because they lacked the mechanisms to do so. The new 1099 reporting will change that.

And I'm amused at how many times I see people say that they'll just deduct all of their purchases for the year. If you get audited, even a slightly dumb IRS agent will laugh you out of the room on that one. They'll want to know what your cost basis was in the items that you sold. As an example, the guy who sold the Strasburg Superfractor last week ain't gonna be able to deduct all of his purchases for the year to offset the sale. His cost basis in the card is at a maximum what he paid for the case and would even more likely be determined to be the cost of the case divided by the number of cards in the case.

Commence people telling someone who has a masters degree in taxation that he doesn't know what he's talking about in 3... 2.... 1...

As someone who has a degree in Accounting and who will be sitting for the CPA in 6 months, I concur. :lol:
 

A_Pharis

Active member
ccouch (Chad) said:
You guys do realize that they've ALWAYS wanted it, right? The laws haven't changed. They've just had a difficult time enforcing the law because they lacked the mechanisms to do so. The new 1099 reporting will change that.

And I'm amused at how many times I see people say that they'll just deduct all of their purchases for the year. If you get audited, even a slightly dumb IRS agent will laugh you out of the room on that one. They'll want to know what your cost basis was in the items that you sold. As an example, the guy who sold the Strasburg Superfractor last week ain't gonna be able to deduct all of his purchases for the year to offset the sale. His cost basis in the card is at a maximum what he paid for the case and would even more likely be determined to be the cost of the case divided by the number of cards in the case.

Commence people telling someone who has a masters degree in taxation that he doesn't know what he's talking about in 3... 2.... 1...

Exactly. Post thanked. And can you even write off losses like that if you aren't filing as a business?
 

phillyfan0417

Well-known member
Administrator
Aug 7, 2008
43,551
43
Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
ccouch (Chad) said:
You guys do realize that they've ALWAYS wanted it, right? The laws haven't changed. They've just had a difficult time enforcing the law because they lacked the mechanisms to do so. The new 1099 reporting will change that.

And I'm amused at how many times I see people say that they'll just deduct all of their purchases for the year. If you get audited, even a slightly dumb IRS agent will laugh you out of the room on that one. They'll want to know what your cost basis was in the items that you sold. As an example, the guy who sold the Strasburg Superfractor last week ain't gonna be able to deduct all of his purchases for the year to offset the sale. His cost basis in the card is at a maximum what he paid for the case and would even more likely be determined to be the cost of the case divided by the number of cards in the case.

Commence people telling someone who has a masters degree in taxation that he doesn't know what he's talking about in 3... 2.... 1...


Great explanation, took kind of a douchy turn at the end but whatever.


Also, had a doctor once tell me I had a sprained knee even though I hadnt hurt it, turned out to be lymes disease.

Just Sayin.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top