200lbhockeyplayer
Active member
- Aug 10, 2008
- 11,049
- 2
If you are simply stating fact, and not assuming anything, then you are for the most part correct.Tick-Tock-Man said:even if you state in the thread that the person sold a fake patch, but didn't necessarily
make the fake patch, your only stating a fact. you shouldn't be liable for stating a fact.
It's easier of course if serial-numbers and signatures are there to verify the accusations as fact, but no matter what...there is no proof that the buyer or seller are the ones doing the faking.