200lbhockeyplayer said:Outside of some perhaps closeted homosexual urges towards Starling with the continued mention of his nipples, I don't get why everyone is blowing up about this.
Instead of bagging the fact that this was clearly shot in color, then knocked down to B&W, why not crucify Leaf for probably shooting digital instead of on film? How about lynching them for using a typeset signature on the mock-up instead of his actual signature? I can just see some clown screaming "false advertising" because the real Starling signature doesn't match the mock-up.
So they paid homage to one of the "classic" cards of the hobby heyday with a whopping 25 cards and get railed on.
In the words of Judge Smails, "Don't you people have homes?"
The original is art. I think that is what is driving the criticism.