- Thread starter
- #21
[/quote:38yse6f1]benmoss84 said:benmoss84 said:wow I touched a nerve with you haven't I? there's no point for me to respond to your comments because I could care less about you opinion honestly. Your just a typical low life with no morals or class.. I wouldn't expect someone like you to understand loyalty... yes it's a business but how do you figure in your warped little head that Moss was under performing? just the season before he had over 1,200 yards and 13 TD'S!!! the 13 td's led the NFL by the way kid! And you can't blame 9 catches in four games on him if he wasn't even thrown too lol. People like you make me wonder just how many people with common sense are even out there. The Patriots owner Bob Kraft is a cheap skate disloyal ass period! he has a history of screwing over players and last I checked the Pats haven't won a SB in over five years... so their not that smart.oh yeah and 51 games/50 td's... and somehow your saying he's to old now and wouldn't be a wise investment??? but somehow an even older Deion Branch was a good pickup??? you're a patriots fan I know, and i don't hate the Pats in general, but they could have showed a little respect to a player that busted his butt for them for over 3 years!!!! point blank is this... your team had its best season EVER with Moss a part of it and it shouldn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how big an impact Randy made for them. so for you to try and write him off as a talent shows how ignorant you are. know your football before you come at me next time and dont think that owning your own little card business means your important. take carebenmoss84 said:He had to restructure in 07 because no one else wanted him. He stuck in 08 because it was the best place for him. He still made $9m per year in that deal, hardly chump change. And the job of owners and coaches is to win games and make money. Signing a 33 year old receiver with 9 catches through 4 games to a long term deal is not a good investment, nothing to do with loyalty. And why should Moss be a team guy? Because that's the way the world works. We all have jobs where we are under appreciated but we suck it up, and we all make way less than $9m per year.KandKCards said:well maybe you're right... but I kinda don't blame him for not being a team guy since the Patriots proved how disloyal they were to him. The man re-structured his contract to play with them in 2007 and turned down an even larger contract from Philly to re-sign with them in 2008! So all he asked for was some appreciation! In 51 games with the Pats he caught 50 TD'S!!!!!! I think THAT deserved some appreciation$$$$ don't you?benmoss84 said:[quote="KandKCards":38yse6f1]I'm not a homer because I'm a Pats fan and loved him when he was here, but take off the Moss-colored glasses. He gave up on the long ball that he should've caught, regardless of whether there was a penalty or not. He ruined a great Pats win in week 1 by talking about his contract in his presser rather than the game. No matter how you spin it, Moss isn't a team guy. Never was, never will be. There's nothing wrong with that; you are what you are.
I'm not sure I agree with the fact that Moss is being misused, but I definitely agree with the fact that Childress is an atrocious coach. But, the ball should be in APs hands more than anyone else's. He's the best RB in the league, and the QB is a turnover machine.
At the end of the day owners and coaches have no loyalty, so why should Moss go out of his way to be a "team guy" when it's not appreciated? When he was blinded to believe the organization did care about him then he played better, like in 2008 after Brady went down i'm sure the haters figured he'd tank (especially after having a brand new contract) but he didn't! Moss is a special and rare type of person, he demands loyalty and respect and if he doesn't get it he shows his displeasure!
Honestly, your posts make you seem like a little kid with no understanding of the realworld who can't figure out why his favorite player was traded.![]()