Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Which Player Would Crush You if You Found Out He Was Juicing

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Zymco

New member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
4,540
Reaction score
0
Location
Bellflower, California
Re: I hope this guy didnt do Steroids

ROLLTIDE4LIFE said:
What do you guys think? Yes or NO?


scan0022.jpg

It very well could kill my spirits if there was a yes to this. Also Jeter and Hamilton like previously mentioned.
 

justinmandawg

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
6,174
Reaction score
0
Location
Kansas City
gamedaygator said:
justinmandawg said:
gamedaygator said:
You win the spelling bee, I will the argument.


I disagree. What gives you the insight on the subject?

It is a simple fact that cortisone is just as "harmful" and as legal as HGH is. My point, that you were so quick to dismiss, is that Schilling injected a substance just as "harmful" and as legal or illegal as HGH.

Then throw out Tommie John surgery, ACL surgery, hell any surgery, and toss in antibiotics.
 

seitas

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
580
Reaction score
12
CAROLINA BOSOX said:
seitas said:
cortisone is a steroid. Schilling injected that into his ankle so that he could pitch. Without the cortisone injection he could not have pitched that game. So is it safe to say that Schilling used a drug that enhanced his performance? Schilling is a hypocrite and regardless of the symantecs of your argument he could not have played without the injection. Without the drug he is not even on the field. Legal or Illegal Schilling was willing to put something foreign in his body to enhance his performance. He is just as guilty as the other guys as far as I am concerned.

Based on your argument then any diabetic player that takes insulin to allow them to play is cheating also?

Diabetes is a condition vs. an ailment. Without the cortisone shot Schilling would not have died he would have sat in the bullpen with an ankle injury.

Other than Adam Morrison are there any known diabetics in pro sports?
 

ffgameman

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
6,698
Reaction score
0
Location
Kentucky
Jay Cutler, Denver Broncos quarterback.

seitas said:
CAROLINA BOSOX said:
seitas said:
cortisone is a steroid. Schilling injected that into his ankle so that he could pitch. Without the cortisone injection he could not have pitched that game. So is it safe to say that Schilling used a drug that enhanced his performance? Schilling is a hypocrite and regardless of the symantecs of your argument he could not have played without the injection. Without the drug he is not even on the field. Legal or Illegal Schilling was willing to put something foreign in his body to enhance his performance. He is just as guilty as the other guys as far as I am concerned.

Based on your argument then any diabetic player that takes insulin to allow them to play is cheating also?

Diabetes is a condition vs. an ailment. Without the cortisone shot Schilling would not have died he would have sat in the bullpen with an ankle injury.

Other than Adam Morrison are there any known diabetics in pro sports?
 

gamedaygator

New member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
justinmandawg said:
gamedaygator said:
justinmandawg said:
gamedaygator said:
You win the spelling bee, I will the argument.


I disagree. What gives you the insight on the subject?

It is a simple fact that cortisone is just as "harmful" and as legal as HGH is. My point, that you were so quick to dismiss, is that Schilling injected a substance just as "harmful" and as legal or illegal as HGH.

Then throw out Tommie John surgery, ACL surgery, hell any surgery, and toss in antibiotics.

Thank you. That is what I am trying to say. MLB's "rule" of what steroids are legal and what is illegal is ridiculous. There is not one person in all of baseball that can tell you which steroids are legal and which ones are illegal. The ARDO test results from SIX YEARS ago do not even state which kind of steroid he tested positive for. For that matter, HGH IS NOT detectible but it is illegal in the eyes of MLB. For one player (Schilling) to be able to preach about how horrible players are for "juicing" when he himseld benifited from a form of a steroid.
 

hive17

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
21,426
Reaction score
24
asmsportscards said:
hive17 said:
you never know they worked out together all the time at the U

The reason (call it rose-colored glasses, whatever) I believe Braun and the other NCAA guys are clean, are the better-than-average tests that go on in college. Baseball guys that go to college have a lot more to lose, so I'd suspect they'd want to wait until they made it to the MLB before they tried getting away with PEDs.

That's why I'd wager that college-ball guys would have a lower number of PED users among their ranks; if any.
 

fengzhang

New member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
0
Location
Chicago, IL
Does anyone have a link that explains why steroids were made illegal in 1991? What was the justification? That steroids are bad for you?
 

seitas

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
580
Reaction score
12
I love the direction of this discussion. I don't have a problem with being a fan during the steroid era. I am knowledgeable enough to be able to put the accomplishments of this era into their proper context. I believe that Bonds was a top 10 all time player without steroids. I believe that with steroids you could make an argument that he is the best ever. Does that diminish Ruth, Mays, Cobb, Mantle? To me it doesn't. Just as not playing against black athletes doesn't diminish the incredible careers of Cobb or Ruth. Every era must be judged on it's own. The game has evolved and will continue to evolve. Rather than worrying about who did or didn't take PED's why can't we just go back to enjoying the game.
 

thenumberonemetfan

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
9,987
Reaction score
0
Location
Bronx,Ny
seitas said:
I love the direction of this discussion. I don't have a problem with being a fan during the steroid era. I am knowledgeable enough put be able to put the accomplishments of this era into their proper context. I believe that Bonds was a top 10 all time player without steroids. I believe that with steroids you could make an argument that he is the best ever. Does that diminish Ruth, Mays, Cobb, Mantle? To me it doesn't. Just as not playing against black athletes doesn't diminish the incredible careers of Cobb or Ruth. Every era must be judged on it's own. The game has evolved and will continue to evolve. Rather than worrying about who did or didn't take PED's why can't we just go back to enjoying the game.

Because espn isnt done covering the story.
 

pujolsjunkie

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
3,753
Reaction score
0
stevezimmer22 said:
I believe Jason Johnson is. Pitcher for the Tigers and Orioles.

I remember when he pitched for the Indians during an ESPN game, his teammates stood in front of him in the dugout to block cameras while an insulin shot was administered. It was really odd.
 

UMich92

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
1,881
Reaction score
60
seitas said:
CAROLINA BOSOX said:
seitas said:
cortisone is a steroid. Schilling injected that into his ankle so that he could pitch. Without the cortisone injection he could not have pitched that game. So is it safe to say that Schilling used a drug that enhanced his performance? Schilling is a hypocrite and regardless of the symantecs of your argument he could not have played without the injection. Without the drug he is not even on the field. Legal or Illegal Schilling was willing to put something foreign in his body to enhance his performance. He is just as guilty as the other guys as far as I am concerned.

Based on your argument then any diabetic player that takes insulin to allow them to play is cheating also?

Diabetes is a condition vs. an ailment. Without the cortisone shot Schilling would not have died he would have sat in the bullpen with an ankle injury.

Other than Adam Morrison are there any known diabetics in pro sports?

There's quite a difference between corticosteroids like cortisone, prednisone, etc. that are anti-inflammatories and anabolic steroids like nandralone, dianabol, testosterone, etc. that increase protein synthesis affecting muscle growth and recovery.

Alex
 

onionring9

Active member
Administrator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,490
Reaction score
12
At this point does it really matter? Just about everybody was doing it. I still don't' understand what unearthing more roid users is going to accomplish. Stop wasting time and money on this and start dedicating it to something productive like prevention.
 

seitas

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
580
Reaction score
12
UMich92 said:
seitas said:
CAROLINA BOSOX said:
seitas said:
cortisone is a steroid. Schilling injected that into his ankle so that he could pitch. Without the cortisone injection he could not have pitched that game. So is it safe to say that Schilling used a drug that enhanced his performance? Schilling is a hypocrite and regardless of the symantecs of your argument he could not have played without the injection. Without the drug he is not even on the field. Legal or Illegal Schilling was willing to put something foreign in his body to enhance his performance. He is just as guilty as the other guys as far as I am concerned.

Based on your argument then any diabetic player that takes insulin to allow them to play is cheating also?

Diabetes is a condition vs. an ailment. Without the cortisone shot Schilling would not have died he would have sat in the bullpen with an ankle injury.

Other than Adam Morrison are there any known diabetics in pro sports?

There's quite a difference between corticosteroids like cortisone, prednisone, etc. that are anti-inflammatories and anabolic steroids like nandralone, dianabol, testosterone, etc. that increase protein synthesis affecting muscle growth and recovery.

Alex

I understand the difference. They both affect change in the body. They both aid the performance and recovery of athletes. Who is to say what is performance enhancing and what isn't? Why is it okay to take one substance that aids your recovery but not okay to take another substance that could also aid recovery? It's when you start to play moral police that you get in trouble.
 

Pinbreaker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
10,253
Reaction score
486
Location
Laguna Niguel, CA
OK how about Jamie Moyer..

I think he could have juiced to get his fastball up to 75 MPH..maybe 80.. ;)

It would not suprise me to see Edgar on the list.. I don't think he did, but ya never know..

I was just watching a little bit on the MLB Network as they are still beating this thing to death..

It's turned into He Said / She Said..

I think she is promoting her book just like Canseco did..
 

jay1065

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,220
Reaction score
0
Location
Lowell, MA
NECpilgrims8 said:
As for Manny, I don't think he was smart enough or cared enough to take anything. He is such a space cadet when it comes to baseball stuff, I really feel he just has a crazy head and insane hitting ability.

You took the words right out of my mouth.

I stopped my Manny collection because of his performance against Mariano Rivera (3 pitches/3 strikes/bat never left his shoulder) and the traveling secretary incident towards the end of his Red Sox career. That being said, I still believe he is probably the greatest pure hitter that I will see in my lifetime. If he is on a list out there, I would be extremely disappointed.
 

Members online

Top