cardboardGIANTS
New member
- Mar 11, 2009
- 152
- 0
koal said:i'm mad they got rid of the poop refractor /50
+1
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
koal said:i'm mad they got rid of the poop refractor /50
thefasterblade said:There are some really big name prospects who are non-autos. I'm surprised to see sales on them as low as they are. I feel like the release just sort of blind sided some people as it didn't have a ton of hype around them, but there are a ton of first year chromes that aren't getting any buzz.
Anyone have an explanation? Am I missing something here?
dchurg said:Only player in the entire set i have interest in is Jericho Jones
dchurg said:Only player in the entire set i have interest in is Jericho Jones
50th round pick said:Maybe I'm just old-school, but I don't view many of the cards in the set as rookies. Most of the key guys have 2007 and 2008 cards in non-Bowman products. And again, I'm old-school, so I think that Elite counts as true RCs.
As for lack of sales interest, I believe that the totally pathetic autograph checklist is the culprit. It's hard to buy a hobby box when you know that you are going to pull a $5 auto.
-mike
PS - I'm amused that Chris Johnson has a "1st Bowman Card" logo - just like he did in 2008 Bowman Chrome. I sometimes think they do this on purpose to try to generate more sales.
dchurg said:Only player in the entire set i have interest in is Jericho Jones
50th round pick said:Maybe I'm just old-school, but I don't view many of the cards in the set as rookies. Most of the key guys have 2007 and 2008 cards in non-Bowman products. And again, I'm old-school, so I think that Elite counts as true RCs.
nborton said:The main issue is people are waiting to see if guys will have an auto in chrome later this year. It's 100% different than the examples so far.
Similar situation:
06 Bowman Alex Gordon
then
06 Bowman Chrome auto Alex Gordon
That's the situation people are worried about. It's totally different than these examples:
06 Bowman Draft Travis Snider
07 Sterling auto Travis Snider
or
07 Bowman Draft Moustakas
08 Bowman Chrome Auto Moustakas
Basically people are either not buying because a) they have an 08 auto in a Donruss set, or b) they are worried Topps will make an auto of the guy in the Chrome release in the SAME year like they did in the Alex Gordon example.
dchurg said:Only player in the entire set i have interest in is Jericho Jones
Topps had every right to sign them too...brouthercard said:Jaypers said:brouthercard said:The design is irrelevant - people will buy the product if the checklist is good.
The easy answer to your question - the player checklist sucks. Blame Razor. It's as simple as that.
Yes, by all means, blame them because Topps is incapable of not repeating the same players over again, rather than sign any one of hundreds of prospects who have yet to have their first cards produced.
Instead of playing the blame game, how about thinking outside the box? Topps has been repeating players since before Razor came around.
By signing most of the top prospects from last year, Razor has really limited topps ability to put out a quality well-balanced checklist. By signing even more borderline prospects, topps really dilutes the overall quality of the checklist. I'm not saying only razor is to blame. Topps has really diluted all their prospects over three products and i'm afraid they have been stretched too thin over the last two years. It's easy to understand why 2009 bowman doesn't sell well, topps has really pushed it's cash cow over the limits.