Re: 2009 Griffey RC Auto buyback Hologram Numbers
No doubt they would look bad...which makes me think....will they be honest about the one they authenticated? Will they just say it is real so they dont look bad.....
Roy Birchler said:brinn1 said:Hi all,
I have been in constant contact with an exectutiive at Beckett who has been kind enough to take an interest in all the controversey surrounding the 2009 Griffey 89 RC auto cards, with and without COA's and with different number sets.
He is especially concerned as one of my cards, the Black Ink Signed #13/89, is Becket authenticated, ie the entire card is judged to be authentic and the Auto graded sepparately.
He now has the 2 hologram numbers from my two cards, one signed in black ink and one signed in blue ink. He has dealt with the "higher ups" at upper deck on many occasions and does not anticiipate any problems getting a very quick answer as to the authenticity of the 2 cards and hologram numbers I gave him.
He expects to get back to me tomorrow with an answer as to those 2 hologram numbered cards, cards which do not have a COA and whose numbers are not in sequence with the other grouping that Roy has developed.
I will report back at that time
thanks
Steve Brinn
Steve, hope for your sake that my theory is wrong. Maybe we will finally get a good answer from UD on this. Beckett would look pretty foolish if they authenticed a fake card.
No doubt they would look bad...which makes me think....will they be honest about the one they authenticated? Will they just say it is real so they dont look bad.....