i43770
New member
mredsox89 said:i43770 said:mredsox89 said:flightposite said:I would also like to say...
Whatever happened to just liking cards, regardless of who made them, and not caring about all the behind the scenes BS?
Its become a business and when people invest rather than collect this is what comes along.
masonphillip said:So if UD was running Razor, then why did things go down the way they did, I mean the product release methods were poor, quality was horrendous and communication with the market was bad. If I was the owner of a company (UD owning Razor) and I had tons of prior experience in the same market, I think I'd make sure those things didn't happen.
I'm not denying that something is going on, I'm just saying it doesn't seem to add up.
Agreed, i just don't see why if UD had control, the simple problems like release and QC would be problems.
I don't understand the part about QC. You are referring to the company that has put out "Sweet Spot" autos that have faded still in the boxes (or tins). And some after a few years are completely gone.
The QC problems with Razor seemed more extreme than just fading sweet spot autos. Maybe not in terms of value, but the majority of signature series cards were in terrible condition upon release.
I would rather have chipping and/or off centered than have a card that the main part of it is gone in a year or two.