maxpower said:BowmanChromeAddict said:As someone who bought two cases direct, I am pretty disappointed with that answer as well. Very weak.KandKCards said:LOL.Russ S. said:Leaf said:[quote="GAbballplayer148":2ogkbgdk]I thought I read somewhere that only 299 cases were being produced, with 6 boxes per case, meaning 1794 boxes/packs/cards.
This was speculated by a poster on a thread when we announced this.
I immedately came on and said that we were not announcing a print run.
I can say there are more than 299. However, we sold out quite easily so I would expect the qty produced was just right.
BG
How PC of you.
So another words, no clue if there are 50 Ripkens, or 4 Ripkens.
Still recycled blah.
At the pricing, unless you like wasting your hard earned money on coke, hookers, and cards, you are better off just buying the card you want on line.
Just my 2 pesos.
Good Luck to those "fortunate" gamblers. Enjoy the coke.
Guys,
This is no "defense of razor" post by a moderator, just making that clear from the start.
Razor Rookie Retro has always been a repackaged product where the only one guaranteed to make bank is Brian Gray. But how is that different than any other product? The only one guaranteed to make money is the manufacturer. You take the good with the bad. BG hasn't stated the total run, perhaps that opens him to make more, but I'm guessing that he's done. Who cares what the odds are on that single Strasburg Super or the Heyward super, or the Michael Jordan Rookies, or the Durant Rookie Autos, and so on and so on. He's already given you 90% of the info. He's already said the worst case is $500 to $600 return...which is about a 60% loss. If you opened every case you'd lose 30% of your money. He already stated that his cost was 80% of wholesale, wholesale was probably around 200, maybe a little higher. So if you're paying $220 to $225 a pack, then it's about a 30% loss across the whole run. This is already known. This product is a gamble in a slightly different way than a new release product in that the value of each card is really already determined, prices fluctuate, and with strasburg going down, these cases will yield even less value than what BG put into it. Sure, Posey's have gone up, some others have as well, but the Strasburg probably wouldn't sell for $10K at this point, and that is half it's previous value. (waiting for BG to come in and say he'd buy it back for that price). All this to say, there is no reason to whine and moan about this product, it is what it is. If you want a ticket for a chance at a card you couldn't afford, then you gotta pony up 2 bills, otherwise, sit back and watch most people get hosed and a few people get really lucky.
I agree with most of what you say, but I still think it's a HUGE leap of faith for someone to just take BG at his word that he's not going to water down the product by producing more. A similar leap of faith is required to trust that the "minimum return" will be $500.
I'm not that familiar with the personal relationships on FCB, so perhaps you know something that I don't, but as just an average collector, I'm concerned about the lack of transparency. As you say, Brian Gray has given us most of the relevant information. However, I'm not sure what the purpose of hiding the print run is. I don't believe Brian has ever addressed the reasoning, but I'd welcome an honest explanation.
Don't take this as a blanket condemnation of Razor/Leaf or the product. I love the idea of this product and have defended the concept in previous posts. I just think the open-ended print run is a big red flag.[/quote:2ogkbgdk]
Thanks for the post. I am not sure how to say this, so I will try the most direct aproach:
We are done producing this item. We are not making anymore and we are not buying any additional cards for this project.
It is not an open ended print run.
The reasoning you request is simple. Typically, we number the cases of all products produced 299 and less. These are ridiculously limited by today's standards and deserve numbering. On the other hand, many companies produce 500 case runs these days on select products. Thus, if I were making 400-500 cases, why would I number.
Again, I hope you guys understand that most companies NEVER tell you print runs. I personally dont find this reason for alarm. They are businesses and how much 2010 Bowman Chrome Baseball Topps is making is not our (yes, I collect/invest/break this) business. They will probably make 5000+ cases. If they #'ered cases, market would freak out.
If we ever announce print run, we will number cases.
In this case, production is over 299, thus no numbering.
Its not like we made 800 cases, lol.....
Hope this helps, but we have given as much transparency as I think should be reasonably expected.
BG