pigskincardboard
New member
With regards to Matt's cases, it could still well be within the expected odds, I really don't know.
The problem with Topps and card companies is that there is no way to figure this stuff out until the day the final checklist appears.
More information would definitely make understanding your risk quite a bit easier.
They are not selling us on an idea, they are selling us a product.
Give the damn checklist ahead of time.
Give the damn pack-odds for the refractors, plates, etc.
Give the damn odds for hitting an autograph AHEAD of time.
If you are inserting 1000 Machado base autographs and 4000 Deck McGuire autographs, break them down into GROUPA & GROUPB and give proper odds.
If you are going to toss base retail autographs in, mention it ahead of time.
Someone should be able to go through the checklist, mark down what they think each card will fetch, and be able to do the math on their expected value.
I'd have a lot easier time judging anyone that busted wax if they had access to the information, but chose to ignore it or didn't understand it.
You have to realize that there's always going to be a chance of either blowing the odds away or succumbing to them. Even in this case, it's a pretty good gamble to expect to get X percent back but there's still a shot of getting X-30% back.
I really think that Topps takes advantage of having sole control of the information and they've yet to be called to task on it. They're selling a *** of product on a regular basis without even telling people what's in it.
There is and there should be risk at the margins, but the vast majority of product should yield what's expected. Furthermore, this is why people are calling Topps to task: Boxes are yielding what's expected, but what's expected is AWFUL. Maybe topps decided that an exclusive license meant they'd have to cut back on ten percent of costs. I don't know.
The number one complaint just seems to be a lack of information.
The problem with Topps and card companies is that there is no way to figure this stuff out until the day the final checklist appears.
More information would definitely make understanding your risk quite a bit easier.
They are not selling us on an idea, they are selling us a product.
Give the damn checklist ahead of time.
Give the damn pack-odds for the refractors, plates, etc.
Give the damn odds for hitting an autograph AHEAD of time.
If you are inserting 1000 Machado base autographs and 4000 Deck McGuire autographs, break them down into GROUPA & GROUPB and give proper odds.
If you are going to toss base retail autographs in, mention it ahead of time.
Someone should be able to go through the checklist, mark down what they think each card will fetch, and be able to do the math on their expected value.
I'd have a lot easier time judging anyone that busted wax if they had access to the information, but chose to ignore it or didn't understand it.
You have to realize that there's always going to be a chance of either blowing the odds away or succumbing to them. Even in this case, it's a pretty good gamble to expect to get X percent back but there's still a shot of getting X-30% back.
I really think that Topps takes advantage of having sole control of the information and they've yet to be called to task on it. They're selling a *** of product on a regular basis without even telling people what's in it.
There is and there should be risk at the margins, but the vast majority of product should yield what's expected. Furthermore, this is why people are calling Topps to task: Boxes are yielding what's expected, but what's expected is AWFUL. Maybe topps decided that an exclusive license meant they'd have to cut back on ten percent of costs. I don't know.
The number one complaint just seems to be a lack of information.