- Thread starter
- #1
Bill Menard
New member
- Aug 26, 2008
- 3,421
- 0
Personally speaking, I feel the ENTIRE hobby has gotten out of complete control in terms of product on the market. Instead of having one product with one set to make (as was the state of baseball cards, more or less, throughout most the hobby pre 1981), we now have 10+ products from EACH company, most of which has the same exact content in it, in one form or another. Instead of one true RC card, a player can now have about 50 "true rookies" from 50 different products across many manufacturers all within the same year. It waters down the secondary market (way too much for people to chose from) and seems to me to be a player collector nightmare (how do I get all the cards of the guy I like and not go completely broke in the process?!?). I do like choices, but I personally feel there are just too many now.
What I would LOVE to see is a return to the simpler days, but with some element of the modern market in it - that is 3-4 Major label companies (all licensed by MLB), limited to 3 products per year with those three products being a base product that perhaps has series (like Topps I, Topps II, Topps Update/Traded), a mid level product (like an UD SPx) and a top tier product (like National Treasures).
There - there are 3 Major label companies, with three tiers of product. I realize we were running 5-6 companies in the 90's, but they only put out one product (or a series 1/2 type thing) and that kept it managable even still.
Also, if I had to chose, I'd want Upper Deck, Topps, and Panini to be the three companies... Leaf if there were a 4th. Oh - and Topps keeps it's Bowman line!!! Ha ha - ok, ok --- now I'm getting complicated again.
On the other hand, this would mean the end of stuff like Topps Chrome, Triple Threads, Museum Collection, Heritage, Turkey Red, etc. For me personally, this would be a GOOD thing, especially if giving licensing rights to other companies.
I'm not saying just have Topps with a base product as was the case until 1981 (again, more or less - I know there were some other products in there).
What would be a good #? Maybe 25 products per year? I mean, that's 2 a month... seems pretty reasonable to me.
What I would LOVE to see is a return to the simpler days, but with some element of the modern market in it - that is 3-4 Major label companies (all licensed by MLB), limited to 3 products per year with those three products being a base product that perhaps has series (like Topps I, Topps II, Topps Update/Traded), a mid level product (like an UD SPx) and a top tier product (like National Treasures).
There - there are 3 Major label companies, with three tiers of product. I realize we were running 5-6 companies in the 90's, but they only put out one product (or a series 1/2 type thing) and that kept it managable even still.
Also, if I had to chose, I'd want Upper Deck, Topps, and Panini to be the three companies... Leaf if there were a 4th. Oh - and Topps keeps it's Bowman line!!! Ha ha - ok, ok --- now I'm getting complicated again.
On the other hand, this would mean the end of stuff like Topps Chrome, Triple Threads, Museum Collection, Heritage, Turkey Red, etc. For me personally, this would be a GOOD thing, especially if giving licensing rights to other companies.
I'm not saying just have Topps with a base product as was the case until 1981 (again, more or less - I know there were some other products in there).
What would be a good #? Maybe 25 products per year? I mean, that's 2 a month... seems pretty reasonable to me.