Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

MrMopar's New Dodgers Autograph Thread (and other interesting items on a slow mailday)

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
This ranks up there as one of the odder items I have added. A primary ballot from CA showing Garvey as a candidate for Senator.

It was $4...was not sure what I'd be willing to pay when I first saw one, as the other one I saw listed at $9.99 OBO and that was too much. Free shipping helped too.
Garvey Ballot.png

May 2024 Big League. I like these cards each year. Fun designs. Reminds of days gone by with simpler designs and such.
May.png
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
O'Connell large print with hand coloring/sig by O'Connell 28/500Garvey Oconnell COlor.jpg

Padre Brochure, 85/86 time frame approxGarvey Catalog.jpg

Dodgers brochure from 1977. This unfolds to 16" x 20" approx.77 Dodgers Brochure.png

Gonsolin /88Gonsolin 88.jpg

Kemp /199Kemp.png

Kendall Refractor /499Kendall.png

PepiotPepiot.png
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
A good mail day today.

Sporting Life custom Garvey/Ryan/Rose 1/1Garvey Rose Ryan Sporting Life.jpg

Garvey mini A&G back. garvey AG Back.png

A paid of Dodger Lofton cards. His first, I believe, other than possibly an Archive buyback. one is /199 the other /25. Couldn't win one to save my life. i had an offer in on the /199 and as soon as I won the /25, the offer was accepted. It goes that way for me quite a bit, but I can life with that. I don't mind dupes.

It appears the /25 is a jersey # match to boot.

Lofton 25.pngLofton 199.png

Reese auto print
Reese.png

A pair of Gonsolin Archives. One /56, the other /99
Gonsolin 56.jpgGonsolin 99.png
Gonzalez /51
A Gonzalez.png

Vargas /18
Vargas 18.png

5 Russell Martin autos

Martin 5.png
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
Garvey /22. A newer insert card, cards your mom threw out or something similar. Don't like those quite as much as "vintage" buybacks, not that 85 would be vintage though. Garvey 22.png
76 Topps team checklist sheet76T Sheet.png

Can't get enough of these more obscure Dodger archives. This particular is a dupe too. /18. G Anderson 18.png

Ishii. Ishii.png

Interesting photo with Wills and Willie DavisWills and David MRM.png

1959 Dodgers record with Vin Scully Full size, 33 1/3 rpm, I think. I didn't take it out to try to play.Vin 59 Dod record mrm.png
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
Sheff /200. Sheffield 200 mrm.png

Alston. Alston.png

This literally showed up today, the day I read that he is leaving the Dodgers after a very short tenure! It's a new one for the list, but with new roster ads this year and a few stubborn older players, I am up to needing 9, possibly 10 to complete the LA run. Landon Knack makes 10, but I may have a card of his already. I forget.
Trammell 99 mrm.png
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
This is a continuation of my great mail day share, started at the monthly pick-up thread. The Dodger part of the mailday was equally exciting...

Sheehan Heritage is the first from the set for me. Still hope to land an Outman at a decent price.
Sheehan.png
A pair of Garvey /25.
Garvey 25 Panini.png Garvey 25.png

Scratched TWO off the Dodger wantlist today. I can't remember the last time I added 2 players in one day. Feyereisen and Covey.
Feyereisen 50.pngCovey mrm.png

The big news in Dodgertown is the discovery (for me at least) of a previously unknown Pepsi Dodger item, this one is a Don Sutton application from 1974! I absolutely love this stuff and hope to still find more in the future.

One day I will get a picture of everyone in one shot, but I have grown quite a nice little collection of this former kids club memorabilia. I always appreciate new Line Drives, but compared to the application, they are garbage!!
Dodger pEPSI.png
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
Garvey /150
Garvey 150.png

I had a few of these, but ended up winning it for $5.50 plus shipping. /70
s-l1600.jpg

Green /15. Another out of it's case, but it was cheap enough to not care too much.
S Green 15.png
 

abide

Member
Apr 29, 2021
77
45
Garvey /150
View attachment 356119

I had a few of these, but ended up winning it for $5.50 plus shipping. /70
View attachment 356120

Green /15. Another out of it's case, but it was cheap enough to not care too much.
View attachment 356121
I picked up a couple "out of case" Green Archive Signatures recently. Up until now, I only got encased from Archives Signature Retired edition.
I'm trying to figure out if people opened up cases, or if they were pulled like this, "leftovers" slated at ARchives Signature retired,
inserted into Archives and Archives Signature [not retired] without the case.
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
I picked up a couple "out of case" Green Archive Signatures recently. Up until now, I only got encased from Archives Signature Retired edition.
I'm trying to figure out if people opened up cases, or if they were pulled like this, "leftovers" slated at ARchives Signature retired,
inserted into Archives and Archives Signature [not retired] without the case.
I assume people have opened them, but I don't know this for sure
 

Dilferules

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2012
1,962
1,773
Auburn, WA
I assume people have opened them, but I don't know this for sure

There are a lot of new people in the hobby that aren't beholden to the way things "should" be done...it used to be that nobody would dare take an uncirculated/encased card out of the original holder, no matter how beat up it was. Now I see plenty of people removing them for whatever reason, including making it easier to ship. I'm in a Facebook group where it seems like the majority of the people see nothing wrong with "doctoring" cards (including soaking them and rebuilding corners/edges) when that type of talk would have gotten you run out of town on a rail 10-15 years ago. We are now the old fogeys, people.
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
There are a lot of new people in the hobby that aren't beholden to the way things "should" be done...it used to be that nobody would dare take an uncirculated/encased card out of the original holder, no matter how beat up it was. Now I see plenty of people removing them for whatever reason, including making it easier to ship. I'm in a Facebook group where it seems like the majority of the people see nothing wrong with "doctoring" cards (including soaking them and rebuilding corners/edges) when that type of talk would have gotten you run out of town on a rail 10-15 years ago. We are now the old fogeys, people.
Yes, I see a very distinct difference in hobby interactions now on both facebook and ebay. The sites like this still seem to be fairly traditional, for now at least.

I got into an argument recently with a seller on ebay who charged over $6.50 for shipping of a single card. I take that with a grain of salt, as I know costs have and keep going up. I believe a basic poadded mailer is over $5 cost now to ship! However, I was irritated to see it show up via standard trading card in a regular envelope. Postage cost was $0.64! I asked for a reasonable refund, because for $6+, I was expecting that I paid for padded/first class. The offered me a full refund to send back the card, which i didn't want. i just wanted a fair shipping fee charged. As we went back and forth, eventually I got the excuse that they have to not only pay for supplies and postage, but also pay for their time, gas, vehicle insurance, new tires, rent, property taxes, meals, a new computer, clothes (because you can't go to the PO naked), etc. Obviously I exaggerated there a bit, but that is what it sounds like to me in this type of case to justify what is essentially stealing from your buyer. When in reality, they probably bought postage thru ebay, printed the label on their printer, slapped it on a 10 cent envelope and walked it out to their mail box. The auction also went quite low, much lower than I expected. Apparently that is also another reason to take advantage of an overcharge of postage by sending it the cheapest possible way.

Surprisingly, in the end, they issued me a full refund. I really don't get that, but I am done arguing over it. I would have been happy with a few bucks knocked off to reflect what I actually paid for, but I guess they showed me. I may be blocked now and that would not bother me. I actually suggested, even requested that they block me if they felt what they had done was fair. This is just another example of what is sucking the fun out of collecting these days.
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
Quite a nice Dodger mail day today...

Garvey 8x10
Garvey 8x10.png

Andruw Jones Archives /14
a jONES 14 4-15 ASIA.png

Thome Archives /18
Thome 18 4-15 ASIA.png

Babe Herman /99. Not to be confused with HOFer Billy Herman, who played around the same time. Babe was quite a hitter. Check out his 1930 season for example. He didn't play quite long enough to rack up the numbers, otherwise he might have been a HOFer himself. I actually don't know the story and will be looking it up, but he was essentially done by age 34 in 1937, but then he came back in 1945 for 37 games with the Dodgers and then was finished again!
B Herman 99.jpg

Outman /25.
s-l1600.jpg

Konerko /500
Konerko mrm.jpg
 

mrmopar

Member
Jan 19, 2010
6,230
4,194
Another great mail day. That means i am spending too much again!

Garvey /5
Garvey 5.jpg

Quad GU /25
Garvey Quad GU 25.jpg

Beltre /5
Beltre 5.jpg

LaSorda
Lasorda 4-21.jpg

LoDuca Buyback /20
Loduca 20 4-13.png

Muncy /50
Muncy 50 4-19.jpg

Gonsolin /99
Gonsolin 99 4-20.jpg

Liranzo. Hopefully beating the rush on this guy, and he eventually makes the team, although it is Leaf. If he gets a Bowman, I'm sure it will be stupid $. This one /6
Liranzo.jpg

Going to include this guy, because I can!
Mattingly 4-14.png

Wong /24
Wong 24.jpg
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top