U L Washington Rookie
Active member
That's not my point. My only problem is the writers using PEDs, to-the-man, as a bar for enshrinement, yet still just guessing about it. Unless there is proof, none of these writer's opinions on who used should be a factor. So either no one from that era gets a vote, or they ALL do, based solely on their stats.
Again, you cannot have an "opinion" that someone did or did not use PEDs; they either did or did not as a fact. Anyone who votes on an assumption is wrong.
And there's little chance that a truly innocent person can prove innocence to those who want to not believe him. So you end up in a sort of witch hunt when going on assumptions. That doesn't do any good.